Home

Welcome to Patriot-Fire.org, a growing website intended to educate people of conservative & libertarian politics (and common sense).

|01-23-2010|
The Deception Factor:

     If you believe gun-control is for the protection of the innocent, please listen up.

     Gun-control does nothing but disarm the good and innocent; and aides the bad and ruthless. Hard to believe? Look at U.S. statistics. The states and/or cities with draconian gun-laws hold higher crime rates than those with less restrictive gun-statutes. Washing D.C., the strictest city in our lands, continues to receive the prestigious title of HCR (Highest Crime Rate). Why don't these laws do their job and prevent and/or decrease crime?

     Pirates on the seas continue to run amok despite the United Nations intervention. Why? Lets look at the U.N.'s ban on all weapons within 'international waters' (with the exception of government entities). If these anti-gun laws were doing their job, wouldn't pirate attacks decrease? Why do these encounters perpetuate and advance in numbers?

     These 'educated' elites must understand that their results equate to failure...after all, history dictates gun-bans only lead to more crime and ultimately a totalitarian government. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Peron, Chavez, etc. etc. took away the best means of defense from their population before, or shortly after, seizing power. Can a disarmed population revolt against a tyrannical government with merely rocks and sticks?

     These politicians don't care about protecting you: it's about advancing their agenda for more power. And that means taking away the last line of defense: your weapons.

     Here's another "crazy" idea of mine: just like abortion, the aim of gun-control points to population reduction. Disarming the law-abiding citizens allows the criminal a greater advantage. We see cities, even entire states (Illinois, California and New York for example), that continue to see the murder rates rise, despite more and more gun laws. Who hurts the most with anti-Second Amendment laws: mostly the poor and minorities. Our "educated" politicians are given police protection, paid for by the People; yet, the People cannot be given a choice of self-defense...even pepper spray has been outlawed in some states.

     What's next? Bad breath?  

     So...they, the power-hungry elites, cheer on abortion (under the guise of "choice" and "freedom") and gun-control (under the false notion of "security" and "safety"); yet, reality acknowledges the complete opposite: more violence, death, and destruction, mostly directed at the poor and minorities.

     Let's remember the abortion rights activist and Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, made several statements regarding the cleansing of minorities (particularly blacks); totalitarian psychos pursued the same goal of cleansing their population of the "unwanted" and "undesirable" through various means (i.e. Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Raul Castro, Lenin, Mussolini, Kim Jong-il, etc.) and continue to do so.

     Even long ago, most rulers, whether we speak of those 200 years ago or 2,000 years ago, understood that a population must be maintained at a "manageable" level, or else the people could not be controlled as easily.

     That same notion doesn't exist today, right? At least, not in the U.S., because we've "evolved" from barbaric behavior, right?

     Perhaps the "Georgia Guidestones" might open some minds. Built right here in the U.S. during 1979, a declaration of many pleasant sounding directives, including: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."

     I wonder how that number could be "maintained"?

     Murderous tyrants of the past advocated these same policies and ended up eliminating and enslaving millions of people. We witness these tactics pursued today within the U.S. Politicians with bad intentions know they cannot place people into gulags, or load them onto trains for concentration/political prison camps (at least not yet): what better way to do this than allow the peasants to rid themselves through abortion and give criminals an upper hand for murder? After all, it's a 'dog eat dog' world, right?

     Why does the Democrat Party propagate these devious plans? Why do some Republicans advance them as well?

     Ruthless tactics for the powerful...or just a koinky dink?

|01-15-2010|
     It's been a while since I've posted anything; not because of the lack of important news or controversy, quite the opposite.  Hopefully I'll gain the time to finish some of the 30+ articles and essays I've started (but haven't finished).
     'Till then, Chuck Baldwin wrote a great piece, "It Is A Madhouse Out There", which pertains to some of my own pieces and ideas I'm working on.

Chuck Baldwin's "It Is A Madhouse Out There".

Some recommended books:
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon Skousen
Counterinsurgency Warfare - Theory & Practice by David Galula
Lure the Tiger out of the Mountains - 36 Strategems of Ancient China by Gao Yuan
Roots of Strategy:  Book 4 edited by David Jablonsky (includes works of Mahan, Corbett, Douhet & Mitchell)

...will add more to the list when I get the chance.